Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Samsung Invades HTC Territory With Android Handset

Samsung Electronics on Monday joined with network operator Taiwan Mobile to try to steal the spotlight from rival High Tech computer (HTC) by launching a handset with Google's Android mobile software, the , in Taiwan.

HTC, the Taiwanese company that worked with Google to develop the first smartphone based on Android, the T-Mobile G1 (also called HTC Dream) had already sent out invitations to a Tuesday press party to launch its third and latest Android handset in Taiwan, the .

HTC reportedly plans to team up with mobile service provider Chunghwa Telecom to market the Hero in Taiwan. The companies worked together to launch the HTC Magic, which with certain mobile service contracts.

Samsung announced the i7500, its first ever Android-based smartphone, in April. The device has a 3.2-inch touchscreen, a 5-megapixel camera and 8GB of internal memory, among other features.

The HTC Hero also sports a 3.2-inch touchscreen, 5-megapixel camera and other features.

Developed by Google, Android is a smartphone operating system that is meant to make Web browsing easy, especially on Google sites such as YouTube and Google Maps.

5 Netbooks Microsoft Has Crushed

Think most netbooks have single-core processors, 1GB of RAM, and a 160GB hard drive because their manufacturers like conformity? Right. The reality -- never officially acknowledged -- is that Microsoft its operating systems to netbooks with specs that are too good (see the limitations ). The result, as evidenced by the of Dell's Mini 12, is tiny netbooks with lesser hardware than full-sized laptops.

A handful of laptops, including the Mini 12, have broken the mold, but they all pay the price in some way. Here's a list of naughty netbooks that Microsoft is crushing with its hardware limitations:

Dell Inspiron Mini 12

dell inspiron mini 12 The crime: Dell's is one of a few netbooks with a 12-inch screen. While that's fine for licensing of Windows XP or Vista (the Mini 12 used the latter), cheap Windows 7 licensing will require netbooks to cap the screen size at 10.2 inches.

Punishment: With no clear explanation why, Dell announced the Mini 12's retirement over the weekend. I'm guessing the company saw the writing on the wall, and decided to discontinue the model rather than face more expensive operating system costs when arrives.

MSI Wind U115

The crime: great sin was packing an 8GB solid state drive and a 160GB hard disk drive together. While TechARP's list of limitations doesn't explmsi wind u115icitly ban hybrid drives -- it only says a netbook needs a certain size of one or the other -- .

Punishment: MSI's act of disobedience was dead in the water just as it began. A company representative in the U.K. that MSI would sell its current stock of U115 netbooks, and then cease production at Microsoft's request.

Archos 10 with Ubuntu

The crime: Archos went way over the maximum HDD size that Microsoft allows for archos 10cheap OS licensing, packing a 500GB drive instead of the maximum 160GB, along with 2GB of RAM. As such, this particular build of the Archos 10 runs on Ubuntu instead of Windows XP.

Punishment: The Archos 10 is living in relative obscurity, released with little fanfare . It's not clear when, if ever, the netbook will migrate into the United States or the rest of Europe.

Raon Everun Note

The crime: Though the Everun Note's screen measures only 7 inches, the notebook is a raon evrun noteparticularly egregious offender. It's the , spiting Microsoft's decree that netbooks should have single-core chips.

Punishment: The Everun Note was already on the pricey side, starting at $599 for a basic configuration, but that's without an operating system. Add an undiscounted copy of Windows XP and you've got a netbook that's even harder to market.

Dell Mini 9

The crime: Dell's added something that's desperately needed amondell mini 9g tiny computers: 2GB of RAM. But as with the Archos 10, this feature was available only for the version running Ubuntu, as Microsoft would not allow such vast amounts of memory when licensing Windows XP on the cheap.

Punishment: The Mini 9 is another netbook heading the way of the dodo. Though its screen size is mainly to blame, I'll bet the computer would still be in demand if it packed Windows XP and 2GB of RAM. In any case, the run on Windows XP.

Toshiba Planning Blu-ray Disc Players, Laptops

Toshiba is players and laptops with support for Blu-ray Disc later this year, it said Monday. The company was the primary backer of the HD DVD optical-disc format that until last year.

toshiba blu-rayIn a brief statement Toshiba said it had applied for membership for the Blu-ray Disc Association (BDA), the standards setting and licensing body and would launch products before the end of 2009.

"In light of recent growth in digital devices supporting the Blu-ray format, combined with market demand from consumers and retailers alike, Toshiba has decided to join the BDA," it said.

Long Time Coming

The move ends an almost that began in August 2002 when it and NEC proposed a blue-laser format to the DVD Forum as a replacement for DVD for high-definition movies. Sony and a group of other companies had announced their intentions to unite with Blu-ray Disc earlier in the year and the stage was set for a battle between the two.

Over several years Sony, Toshiba and a handful of other heavy hitters in the consumer electronics industry pitched products against each other. An increasingly heated debate on the formats left consumers confused, and most people stayed away from either until a winner was decided.

That came in February 2008 when Toshiba, seeing its final few supporters jump ship to Blu-ray Disc, chose to throw in the towel on HD DVD.

Although now over, the effects of the battle continue to be felt today. A recent poll by Harris Interactive found many U.S. consumers are not excited about a high-definition video disc despite the popularity of high-definition TV.

Among consumers who don't own a Blu-ray Disc player, only 7 percent said they are likely to purchase one this year while the rest are not likely to take the plunge, the online poll found. It surveyed 2,041 U.S. adults between April 13 and 21 this year.

On the software side Harris found only a quarter of consumers were planning to switch exclusively to Blu-ray Disc with the remainder still picking up DVDs. In the year since the format battle was decided, U.S. sales of Blu-ray Discs have only managed to double, according to figures from industry association The Digital Entertainment Group.

Sunday, August 9, 2009

Microsoft's SharePoint thrives in the recession

Hang around at Microsoft's Redmond, Wash., headquarters for 5 or 10 minutes and someone dressed in khaki pants and a blue shirt is bound to tell you about the wonders of SharePoint--one of the company's most successful and increasingly controversial lines of software.

Think of SharePoint as the jack-of-all-trades in the business software realm. Companies use it to create Web sites and then manage content for those sites. It can help workers collaborate on projects and documents. And it has a variety of corporate search and business intelligence tools too.

Microsoft wraps all of this software up into a package and sells the bundle at a reasonable price. In fact, the total cost of the bundle often comes in below what specialist companies would charge for a single application in, say, the business intelligence or corporate search fields.

It can't do everything. Executives at Microsoft will readily admit that the bits and pieces of SharePoint lack the more sophisticated features found in products from specialist software makers."We don't claim we do everything," said Chris Capossela, a senior vice president at Microsoft. "If we do 50 percent of the functions that these other companies do, but they're the ones customers really want, that's fine. The magic is that end users actually like to use the software."

This strategy seems to have worked even during the recession.

While Microsoft's Windows sales fell for the first time in history this year, its SharePoint sales have gone up. Microsoft declines to break out the exact sales figures for the software but said that SharePoint broke the $1 billion revenue mark last year and continued to rise past that total this year, making it the hottest selling server-side product ever for the company.

Companies like Ferrari, Starbucks, and Viacom have used SharePoint to create their public-facing Web sites and for various other tasks. All told, more than 17,000 customers use Sharepoint.

In many ways, SharePoint mimics the strategy Microsoft took with Office by linking together numerous applications into a single unit. This approach appeals to customers looking to save money and also represents a real threat to a variety of business software makers.

Many of these specialists like Cognos, a business intelligence software maker, and Documentum, a content management software maker, have been gobbled up by larger players looking to create their own suites. IBM, for example, , while . Other companies like Autonomy, a maker of top-of-the-line corporate search software, remain independent.

Crucially, Microsoft has found a way to create ties between SharePoint and its more traditional products like Office and Exchange. Companies can tweak Office documents through SharePoint and receive information like whether a worker is online or not through tools in Exchange. These links have Microsoft carrying along its old-line software as it builds a more Internet-focused software line.

"SharePoint is saving Microsoft's Office business even as it paves the way for a new era of Microsoft lock-in," said Matt Asay, an executive at Alfresco, which makes an open-source content management system. "It is simultaneously the most interesting and dangerous Microsoft technology, and has largely caught its competitors napping."

Along these lines, Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's chief executive, has talked about SharePoint as the company's next big operating system.

Microsoft has managed to undercut even the panoply of open-source companies playing in the business software market by giving away a free basic license to SharePoint if they already have Windows Server. "It's a brilliant strategy that mimics open source in its viral, free distribution, but transcends open source in its ability to lock customers into a complete, not-free-at-all Microsoft stack--one for which they'll pay more and more the deeper they get into SharePoint," Asay said.

A number of smaller software companies have been eager to piggyback on SharePoint's success. Based in San Diego, Sharepoint360 provides consulting services and software development help around the product. The company started after employees at a construction company built some Sharepoint applications and decided to market the software to other construction firms.

The start-up has helped construction companies create systems for managing projects, allowing various people to check in on the progress of a building and keep track of documents tied to the site. It has also expanded beyond the construction area doing work for NASA, Nestle, and Toshiba, according to Paul West, a co-founder of SharePoint360.

The company offers to host SharePoint applications for customers. Microsoft too wants to host more software for companies as it moves toward the cloud computing model.

West recognizes that Microsoft may begin stepping on its partners' toes. "It may certainly come to pass that they pull the switch," he said. "That would have implications for us."

In the meantime, however, Microsoft subsidizes training courses and consulting work for companies like Sharepoint360.

Next year, Microsoft plans to release a new version of the software packed full of more advanced features, including stronger ties to the corporate search technology it acquired in the $1.2 billion purchase of Fast Search and Transfer, a Norwegian start-up.

Best Buy uses the Fast technology today to provide on-the-fly pricing information to customers performing product searches on its Web site.

By making these more sophisticated tools available to customers, Microsoft thinks it can keep pushing niche software makers out of the way and give business people, rather than just the tech folks, a way to work with business applications.

"We believe customers can turn off some of these point solutions," said Kirk Koenigsbauer, a general manager in Microsoft's business software group. "With SharePoint, we can deliver a very, very approachable application to end users."

Mozilla issues first Firefox 3.6 alpha version


Mozilla has released the first alpha version of , a browser with speed improvements and new features the organization hopes to finalize faster than its predecessor.

"Unlike the year that passed between Firefox 3 and , we expect that this will be released in a small number of months," Mozilla evangelist Friday.

, has a variety of changes, but it's not as dramatic a departure as 3.5 was from 3.0. Among the 3.6 features are faster JavaScript, the Web programming language Firefox executes with its ; faster page-rendering speed; some new features for technology for controlling some of the look of a Web site; and a feature called the that handles complicated layout circumstances better.

Performance is a big issue with browsers these days as people spend more time using them and programmers create more sophisticated sites and applications that live on the Web. All major browser makers are emphasizing performance improvements in their newest versions.

Google Voice Can Sneak onto iPhone

Despite , Google Voice will soon be available for iPhone -- as a Web-based app, says .

google voice apple app storeThe all-things-phone-management application (which was widely for threatening AT&T profits on calling plans) will be remade as a stylized Web site that offers everything the rejected app would have.

It is unclear if Apple would reject a repurposed Google Voice app. But earlier in the year Apple did allow Google to promote as a Web app after it was rejected from the App Store.

Considering their recent decision has managed to draw attention from a wide range of people, including some at the , it probably wouldn't be the best choice to block a rethought Google Voice app.

apple iphone google voiceWeb apps can be bookmarked on the iPhone interface and appear like an app purchased from the App Store. You can browse available Web apps, ranging from Facebook to BPlayer (which "allows you to listen to your favorite Belgian radio stations") .

It should be noted you can currently visit a text-heavy version of Google Voice on your iPhone by pointing Safari to .

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Windows 7 Bug Is No Showstopper

Microsoft released the RTM version of yesterday to the Microsoft technical community. The initial excitement quickly turned to sensational headlines about a "showstopper" or excitement and cause people and businesses to shun the new operating system as they did Windows Vista. Those headlines are the very definition of FUD (spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt).

Windows 7 bug

The "critical" bug is related to a memory leak issue with the CHKDSK utility, with one caveat- it's not an issue…or a bug really. Soon after the RTM version of Windows 7 was available to the technical community reports started to pop up that a flaw had been discovered. Apparently, when running CHKDSK, a disk integrity checking and repair utility that has been included with virtually every version of Windows, the system would grind to a halt or even produce the notorious BSOD (Blue Screen of Death).

The bug does not occur just any time you run CHKDSK though. According to reports, the issue only arises if CHKDSK is run on a drive or volume other than the primary boot volume, and only if the '/r' switch is used as well. The '/r' switch tells the utility to locate bad sectors and attempt to repair them and recover the data they contain. When these conditions are met, CHKDSK apparently eats up all available physical memory and slows the system to a halt or crashes it entirely.

, has pointed out that the reported behavior is by design. When the '/r' switch is used the CHKDSK utility is supposed to use the maximum amount of resources available to complete the repairs as quickly as possible. CHKDSK is designed to use all but 50Mb of available memory when the '/r' switch is invoked and users should not expect to be able to continue using the computer for other functions during the CHKDSK repair process.

That doesn't explain the BSOD reports, but those reports are actually much more obscure. It seems that there may be certain hardware configurations that result in a BSOD during the CHKDSK process. Those are isolated incidents though related to specific hardware setups. Microsoft has recommended that those experiencing severe problems such as the BSOD first ensure they have current drivers installed before declaring that the sky is falling.

So, to clarify, many headlines have declared Windows 7 potentially dead on arrival as a result of an obscure utility performing as designed and possibly resulting in a system crash in certain isolated situations. I think we can call off the coroner and not cancel the Windows 7 victory parade just yet.

Another Day, Another Apple Tablet Rumor

The fog appears to be lifting on the computer, with fresh "details" gaining splashy new headlines. Piper Jaffray, financial analyst , appears to be willing to bet the farm that the Apple tablet is real and will cost $600, be available early 2010, and will mint Apple $1.2 billion in revenue next year.

Munster is sticking his neck out a little further from earlier predictions he's made regarding the Apple tablet. In a case of "is this ," in launch, price, and impact on Apple's bottom line. Today's predictions appear to be a refinement to those May predictions.

So what new insight does Munster offer? Not much. But if you listen carefully while reading Munster's predictions you can almost hear the distant cries of "The Apple tablet is coming! The Apple tablet is coming!"

Gene Munster, Sr Research Analyst with PiperJaffray

Here are his top predictions for the devices, according to a blog posting on the

, Munster is now looking at a price of about $600, right about in the middle of the expectations he described in May, when he believed the price would be between $500 to $700. "Assuming Apple sells about [two million] tablets at a $600 [suggested price] in [2010] it would add about $1.2 billion or about 3% to revenue" next year for Apple, he wrote in his report, according to the blog.

*So ? Munster is still sticking with his estimate of early 2010. "As talk over a new tablet device from Apple [grows], we are reiterating our thesis that in early [2010] Apple will introduce a touch-screen device similar to an iPod Touch but larger," Munster wrote in his report. "Last week we spoke with an Asian component supplier that has received orders from Apple for a touch-screen device to be fulfilled by late [2009]. This data point underscores our thesis that a tablet will likely launch in early [2010]."

* and even buy one? "In most respects, we believe Apple will target the netbook market with its new device," Munster wrote. "In our estimate most netbook buyers are drawn to the portability for prices lower than a full laptop, and use netbooks primarily [for] Web surfing, e-mail, and media. We believe an Apple tablet would be priced 30%-50% below the $999 MacBook, and would offer best in class Web, e-mail, and media software. In other words, we believe Apple's tablet would compete well in the netbook category even though it would not be a netbook."

*What will an ? "We expect the tablet hardware to be similar to an iPod touch but larger; we expect the key differentiator of the device to be its software," Munster wrote. "While there are several options ranging from a touch screen Mac OS X to an iPhone-like OS, we expect the tablet to be driven by a new version of Apple's iPhone OS that runs a new category of larger apps alongside all the current apps from the App Store."

Now we wait. Is there an Apple tablet heading to stores near you just in time for the holidays?

You Must Obey: The Unwritten Laws of Technology

Tech Law Frustration but we've got him beat. Here at the (unofficial) Tech Law Brain Trust, we maintain a definitive, ever-expanding archive of the laws that govern your technology experiences--whether you know it or not. Please scan these lists to ensure that you are in compliance.

Basic PC Laws

Let's start with Nerve Central--the computer.

Law 1: For every fix that a Windows Update patches, the update will break two more things on your PC. --Darren Gladstone, PC World

Windows Update HellLaw 2: The likelihood that Windows will automatically install time-sucking critical updates is directly proportional to your need to get your PC started. --Steve Fox, PC World

Law 3: The just before you were going to . --Denise Paolucci, Dreamwidth Studios via (HARO)

Law 4: Your data will get corrupted just before you plug in your new backup external drive. --Darren Gladstone, PC World

Law 5: Your backup plan is only as good as your last successful restore. --Michael Fisher, ElephantDrive.com via HARO

Law 6: The number of USB ports on your Mac will always be one less than you need at any given time. --Blair Hanley Frank, Macworld

Law 7: Feeling time pressure to make a computer fix quickly will cause you to take longer. --David Marshak, via

Law 8: If you close the PC case with screws before testing, it won't work; If you test before closing, it will. --Harry Liebman via HARO

Tech Support Rules

Now that you've mastered the basics, you're ready to move on to Tech Support.

You ARE the Tech Support!Law 1: Fix a computer for a friend or family member, and you'll be tech support for life. --Danny Allen, PC World

Law 2: for someone, and he/she owns you! --Louis Farbstein, via PC World's Facebook page

Law 3: Recommend a product that you've used with no problems, and the friend/family member who buys it will immediately descend into RMA [product return] hell. --Scott Keck, via PC World's Facebook page

Law 4: Show any handy IT skills at work, and your company's IT department will start referring difficult coworkers to you. --Lars Jacobsen, via PC World's Facebook page

Law 5: If it's broken and you call tech support, it will fix itself while you're on hold. --Brenda Christensen, Public Relations, Servoy.com via HARO

Internet Ordinances

You can find a world of trouble online. For instance...

Keep your friends close...Law 1: Within a month of agreeing to be "friends" with your boss you will regret it, big time. --Tom Spring, PC World

Law 2: The crappier the Web site, the sleazier (and sketchier) the ads. --Tom Spring, PC World

Captcha drives us nuts!Law 3: When entering on a Web site, you'll always type in the numeral 1 when the site wants a lowercase L, and a capital O when the site wants the number 0. --Steve Fox, PC World

Law 4: Just before taking out the boss in a , your Internet connection will die. --Nick Mediati, PC World

Law 5: The difficulty involved in is directly proportional to the dollar value of the rebate. --Tom Spring, PC World

The kitten did it.Law 6: A will always find its way to the (unintended) recipient. --Brian X. Chen

PC World Podcast 38: Twitter Attack, iPhone App Rejections, and Hot New Cameras

This week on the PC World Podcast, join editors Robert Strohmeyer, Tim Moynihan, Mark Sullivan, and Nick Mediati for a discussion of the hottest recent tech stories.

It was a tough week for and , as both services were the target of a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS). Listen to the gang discuss the implications of the social networking downtime, both for businesses and the extremely bored. (Since the podcast was recorded, reports have surfaced that the attacks .)

Apple's iPhone app-approval process still has everybody talking--even the FCC. The was the latest victim of , and the resulting hubbub prompted a written response from Apple executive Phil Schiller. Plus, the recent debacle still has Strohmeyer scratching his head, and .

And finally, it's been , with many big-name manufacturers announcing new models for the fall and the holiday shopping season. Learn about the most exciting new announcements, from a to an .

Samsung Reclaim: Nice Idea, But Who Recycles Phones?

’s launch of the new , an environmentally friendly that’s 80-percent recyclable, is getting plenty of media buzz. And while the Reclaim is a step in the right direction, there’s a less impressive statistic you should know about: Just 1 out of 10 mobile phones is recycled.

Samsung Green Phone: Nice, But Who Recycles Cell Phones?

When it comes to cell phones, consumers just don’t act green, says the , which is working with wireless providers and handset makers to improve the situation. From the EPA site:

“EPA has targeted cell phone recycling because only 10 percent of cell phones are recycled each year and most people do not know where to recycle them.”

The agency is currently conducting a year-long campaign, Plug-In To eCycling, with major players in the wireless industry, including AT&T, Best Buy, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Office Depot, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, Sprint, Staples, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless. The partners have pledged to educate consumers on how and where to recycle phones, and to work with communities to hold phone-collection events.

Where’s Your Old Phone?

Are consumers unsure of how to recycle their old handsets, or is it simply easier not to? After all, cell phones are tiny. After buying a new phone, it’s all too easy to stash the old device in a desk drawer and forget about it.

A phone in a desk drawer isn’t an environmental threat. The trouble begins when people toss their old handsets in the trash, which invariably wind up in a landfill. It’s there that the phones’ toxic cocktail of hazardous materials are dangerous.

Green activists have long derided the mobile phone as an . Recycling these devices keeps dangerous materials out of landfills and incinerators. It also reduces greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA estimates that recycling all of the 100 million mobile phones in the U.S. that have reached the end of their lives would save enough energy to power more than 18,500 U.S. households with electricity for one year.

The wireless industry needs to do more to encourage recycling. Outreach programs like the EPA’s Plug-In To eCycling are a good start, but greater incentives are needed. Why not pay cash for old phones? Think of it as a Cash for Clunkers program for the handset crowd.

To its credit, Sprint appears serious about boosting the rate of phone recycling. CEO Dan Hesse says his company hopes to recycle 90 percent of wireless devices by 2017.

Windows 7: The Good, The Bad, and The Unknown

For most people who are considering moving to Windows 7, October 22 is D-Day. On that date Microsoft's newest operating system lands on store shelves, both as a shrinkwrapped upgrade and preinstalled on new PCs. For some folks, though, D-Day has already arrived. Microsoft has to large companies that buy Windows via volume licenses, as well as to IT pros who belong to its Technet service. The Windows Vista era is officially drawing to a close--although you could argue that it never really quite started--and the Windows 7 one is under way.

And that promises to be a good thing, whether you're a satisfied Vista user, a disgruntled one, or a Windows XP holdout who has been waiting for something better. Windows 7 feels like an anti-Vista: Unlike that OS, for instance, it doesn't try to dazzle you with flashy new visual effects. With the , Win 7 actually does fewer things than Vista did. Even its unprepossessing name is a change from the epic-sounding monikers that began with the unfortunate Windows Millennium Edition.

But Windows 7's lack of glitz is a huge part of its appeal. Unlike the increasingly chaotic and annoying Microsoft OSs that preceded it, Windows 7 is designed to stay out of your way so that you can get stuff done. It smartly addresses Windows annoyances both new (User Account Control) and old (the system tray). And the final version I've been using seems to realize the promise of the .

Windows 7 isn't without its warts, but I haven't been so impressed by a new Microsoft operating system since Windows 2000 debuted close to a decade ago. Here's a quick look at some of its best features, a few drawbacks, and areas where reserving judgment makes sense. (Much more PC World coverage is on its way, including an in-depth review with speed benchmarks, upgrade tips, and Windows 7 system reviews.)

The Good...

The OS is less piggish: One of the many regrettable things about the initial version of Windows Vista was that its signature feature--the splashy Aero environment--was too much of a resource hog to run well on many early-2007 PCs (even those that had been ). The PC World Test Center hasn't benchmarked the shipping version of Windows 7 yet--stay tuned--but all signs point to this OS being sprightly enough to perform decently on all current systems, including those allegedly underpowered, pint-size machines known as netbooks.

The taskbar has been reinvented: It's amazing how little the taskbar and its system tray have changed since Windows 95. In Windows 7, they both undergo sweeping, long-overdue makeovers. For the most part, the results are extremely pleasing.

The new taskbar's default style does away with text labels and relies solely on program icons, therefore making better use of screen space. Its thumbnail previews--an improvement over Vista's--work well even when you have multiple windows open for one application. And the new Jump Lists feature gives you right-click access to context-sensitive menus of options (such as the ability to play shuffled music in Windows Media Player) even before you've launched an application. Even the nub on the right edge of the taskbar, which you can click to reveal the desktop, is a welcome, subtle enhancement. (One taskbar quibble: The border around running apps in the taskbar isn't a clear enough cue to distinguish between them and those that aren't currently active.)

The system tray--which is officially called the notification area, although I don't know anybody who calls it that--is no longer one of Windows' most aggravating "features." When you install new applications, any associated system-tray applets are cordoned off in a holding pen, where they can't clutter up the tray and can't use word balloons to pester you with information that you may or may not care about. You can also choose to have an applet appear in the system tray but in bound-and-gagged form, so it can't pop up messages. Microsoft has also dramatically reduced the volume of distracting messages from Windows itself, courtesy of Action Center, which queues up system alerts so that you can check them out at your convenience.

UAC is now tolerable: Windows Vista introduced User Account Control, which tries to warn you of attempts by viruses and other malware to tamper with your system. But it essentially has two settings: So Annoying You Click Without Thinking, and Off. In Windows 7, you get two intermediate settings that alert you only if a program changes settings, with or without the melodramatic screen-dimming effect. This new version is such a reasonable approach that it's even more mysterious how Microsoft could have botched the Vista version so badly.

Libraries collect your files: For years, Microsoft has tried to train Windows users to store all of their personal files in one place, helpfully providing a folder named My Documents for that purpose. Many of us blithely ignore the suggestion and store stuff willy-nilly around our hard drives. A new feature called Libraries splits the difference by giving you virtual folders for documents, music, photos, and videos that combine the contents of whichever folders you specify into one unified view. The Pictures Library, for instance, can show all your photos even if they're stored in a dozen different places. Still, there's room for improvement--Libraries would be even more useful if they were integrated with the existing Saved Searches feature, which creates another, separate form of virtualized folder.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Windows 7: How to Get It Early

released the ready-to-ship version of its operating system to software developers and IT professionals on Thursday, raising the question as to when consumers will be able to get their hands on a copy—be it via download, shrink wrap, or preinstalled on a new PC.

Starting today, subscribers can download a “release-to-manufacturing” (RTM) copy of Windows 7 in English, according to Microsoft’s . Versions in other languages will be available October 1.

Microsoft’s Volume License (VL) customers with a Software Assurance license will be able to download Windows 7 RTM in English starting Friday, with editions in other languages coming “in a few weeks.” VL customers without an SA license can also grab an RTM copy early, although they’ll have to wait until September 1.

Here’s a handy chart from The Windows Blog that sums things up nicely:


Haven’t Heard Your Name Called Yet?

If you’re not a developer, IT pro, or volume buyer, how can you get your hands on a copy before the official October 22 launch?

Beta testers who participated in Microsoft’s Technical Beta Program—an invitation-only affair—can grab via the beta software site.

For rest of us, the remaining options are limited. You could order Windows 7 now, of course, but it won’t arrive until sometime near October 22. Or you could stroll the Internet’s dark alleyways and download a pirated copy of Windows 7 RTM, but we’re not recommending that option. Recent reports indicate that in July.

For a free test drive of Windows 7, you might want to download the . It may not be the final version, but it’s pretty close. You better hurry, however, as the RC download is available only until August 20.

As test drives go, the RC is a marathon tour. It expires on June 1, 2010, and will shut down every two hours starting March 1, 2010. That’s plenty of time to decide if a .

Why Attack Twitter?

Twitter and Facebook with denial-of-service attacks that can knock a site offline, but don't steal information or cause permanent damage. The question is, why?

Both sites have lately for online crooks who try to trick users into installing malware on their PCs. Malicious tweets or Facebook messages might , but instead install fake security software. Kaspersky today posted about the most social engineering attacks used by the against Facebook and Twitter users.

But today's attacks against the sites are different. Denial-of-service attacks, or DoS, overwhelm a site or service with so much garbage data that it can't respond to normal requests. Your browser might ask a site to send the text, code and images used to display its Web page, but during a DoS attack the site is snowed under and can't respond. So you don't see anything.

These types of attacks are usually distributed attacks, or DDoS, meaning the flood of data comes from many different sources. Usually that means a botnet -- a botnet controller can order every infected PC in the botnet to send garbage data to a particular site. When a given botnet might comprise tens or hundreds of thousands of bot-infected PCs, that ends up being more than enough garbage data to overwhelm many sites.

But while crooks can and do make a good deal of money with malware and fake security software, and use any number of tricks to get it on PCs, denial-of-service attacks don't install malware. They don't steal data that might be sold, and while DoS attackers have in the past used the assaults to demand a ransom from the victim sites, there's no word of such a request from either Facebook or Twitter. And large sites aren't usually the target for such (already uncommon) extortion attempts. So why are they happening?

Malware wants to quietly steal and make money, but DoS attacks are generally meant to hurt their target in a very public fashion. And one commentator, Randy Abrams of ESET, which makes antivirus software, guesses that Twitter in particular might have by fighting back against malware attacks. He notes that Twitter has recently begun filtering URLs to block those used in malicious tweets, which might have hurt the crooks' bottom line.

But Abrams also writes that "there are still other ways thieves can make money and they make none at all if Twitter is down," and that the DDoS attacks might come from someone more interested in notoriety than immediate gain. A "look-at-me" idiot, or even someone who wants to advertise the power of their available-for-hire botnet.

We'll likely get more clues as to the why of these DDoS attacks, but right now it's mostly a guessing game. Check PC World's for further updates, as well as . McAfee has also posted some commentary on the attacks, and says it's

Thursday, August 6, 2009

Twitter Limps Back to Life After DDoS Attack

After being , Twitter warned users that its site still wasn't fully back up to speed.

Twitter Limps Back to Life After DDoS AttackTwitter went down around 9:05 a.m. ET, according to figures from AlertSite, which tracks Web site performance. The company also noted that Twitter started to come back online around 11 a.m. but only had 40 percent availability at that time. The microblogging site was more fully operational by 11:30 a.m. ET.

Twitter confirmed this morning that by a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack.

"As we recover, users will experience some longer load times and slowness," Twitter reported in its status update. "This includes timeouts to API clients. We're working to get back to 100% as quickly as we can."

Twitter had noted the attack earlier in the day and said at the time that it was trying to defend itself.

Twitter co-founder Biz Stone showed his frustration with the situation in a tweet posted late this morning. "We had a lot of things we'd rather be doing this morning, defending against a DoS wasn't one of them," he wrote.

The outage left millions of Twitterers adrift this morning, with many taking to Facebook to voice their frustrations about not being able to post tweets or follow others. One Facebook user noted, "Suffering tweet withdrawal."

A distributed denial of service attack occurs when computers flood a Web site with requests for information -- effectively shutting it off from other legitimate traffic.

"It's a bit like 15 fat men trying to get through a revolving door at the same time -- nothing can move," said Graham Cluley, a senior technology consultant for Sophos, in a blog post. "Don't underestimate the impact an attack like this can have, by the way. Twitter isn't just about meaningless piffle, although there's a fair bit of that. Companies are using it to keep in touch with their customer base, and consumers take advantage of the site's intimacy to get an answer from large companies that are discovering how to have a 'human face' online."

Ken van Wyk, principal consultant at KRvW Associates and a columnist for Computerworld, noted that major Web sites are frequently hit with DDoS attacks but they rarely result in total outages.

"Most sites grow to a level of resiliency that is quite good, although certainly not perfect," said van Wyk, adding that the attacks are tough to defend against. "At some level, they're impossible. Although TCP/IP and our modern networks are pretty robust operationally, overwhelming a data pipe with vast amounts of data can still be an effective denial-of-service attack.

"Very large enterprises are quite good at getting huge data pipes and distributing their processing at geographically -- including network geography -- disperse locations," he said. "These things all make DDoS more difficult to accomplish, but not im

New Google Chrome Beta - More Speed, More Features

As noted on the official , a new beta version of the company's dropped today. promises more speed and features, so I kicked the tires a bit myself to see how it stacks up.

First, the features. New to this beta release are some welcome enhancement to the New Tab page, which in Chrome displays thumbnails of your most commonly visited sites. The new release allows you to reorder these thumbnails by dragging and dropping them.

You can also pin a selection so it doesn't get overwritten just because you visited some different sites for a week or so, and hide parts of the New Tab page with new layout buttons.

These are huge additions, because Chrome's New Tab page, while great in concept, desperately needed a way for users to override the algorithm that decides what to put there. It's an issue of customization and browsing the way you want to, and of privacy.

The address bar, which Google calls the "omnibox" because it does contextual searches of your history, favorites, and Google web searches, has gotten a bit of a facelift as well. The functionality is the same, but the presentation has changed. There are now little icons to let you know if a omnibox result is from the web, your history, or your bookmarks.

The Chrome team has taken a lead from the Gmail team and realized that not everyone wants to look at a plain white (or glass, or light blue) background. So the latest beta incorporates support for Themes. Looking through the , it's clear that many of them are far too rich and colorful to be usable. They're downright distracting and hard to stare at for hours a day. Others, like , seem quite usable. Right now, it's less about the quality of the current themes than the ability to use them at all. The gallery will no doubt expand greatly over time. What Google really needs to do is release the specs necessary for people to create and upload their own themes.

Last but not least on the new features side of things is expanded support for , including video tag functionality and web workers. This is very much work-in-progress stuff, but it's good that work is being done and publicly tested.

So, what about performance? The latest stable release of Chrome is 2.0.172.39, and the new beta is 3.0.195.4. I compared these two on a Core i7 920 based PC running the release candidate of Windows 7.

The standard release scores 3737 in Google's own Javascript benchmark suite, the new beta scores 4611, about a 23% increase. The standard release completes the Javascript test in 632.2ms, the new beta in 509.8ms. That's roughly 20% faster. So, while I didn't see the 30% performance improvement Google promises on its blog, it certainly is quite a bit faster. Of course, your mileage may vary - there may be more of a speed boost for those without such high-end CPUs.

Regardless, Chrome is shaping up to be a very impressive, and very usable, browser. Give the new beta a try and let us know what you think in the comments below.

Amazon Kindle vs. New Sony Readers: Game On!

Amazon Kindle vs. New Sony Readers: Game On!Sony two new e-book readers to compete with Amazon's Kindle series. But do they really have the potential to outsell Amazon's hot device? Have a look at the chart I put together, which compares the basic specs of Sony's and Amazon's e-book reader offerings, and read on for more commentary.

Sony's new "Pocket Edition" and "Touch Edition" e-book readers are coming from the Japanese company to tackle the Kindle. Only this time, they are more aggressively priced: a Pocket Edition Sony Reader (PRS-300) will cost $199 when it goes on sale on August 25 -- a whole $100 cheaper than Amazon's Kindle 2.

Sony's PRS-300 has a smaller screen than -- only 5 inches. Sony's Pocket Edition reader is also lighter, but as a major downside, it only features 440MB of storage. Sony says that will be enough for 350 e-books. But that is still a lot less than Kindle 2's 2GB of storage (4GB on ), enough for about 1500 books (3500 books on the Kindle DX).

Sony however, will launch another e-book reader next to the Pocket Edition, called Touch Edition (PRS-600) -- priced on par with the Kindle 2 -- for $299. The Sony Reader Touch Edition will feature a 6-inch screen but with the same low amount of on-board storage as the PRS-300. Only that the Touch Edition Sony Reader will support Memory Stick Pro Duo cards from Sony and SD cards for memory expansion.

Sony claims a two-week battery life for both of its upcoming e-book readers, a number the par with Amazon's claims for the Kindle 2 and Kindle DX (with wireless turned off). But, yes, Amazon's e-book readers still claim supremacy when it comes to downloading books wirelessly, thanks to . Sony's new readers use only USB to download books, but the company is rumored to launch a reader with this feature in the near future as well.

A cool feature on the Sony Reader Touch Edition, as the name says, is the touchscreen panel, which would eliminate the need of a full physical keyboard as present on the Kindle. The Touch Edition from Sony lets users turn pages by swiping their fingers and also features a virtual keyboard for touch input. A stylus comes with the Touch edition, which can be used either for handwriting notes on the reader or with the virtual keyboard provided.

Sony has now matched Amazon's price for new releaser and best sellers, now $9.99 (down from $11.99). , which has released (free) for the company's e-book readers.

Meanwhile, Amazon hasn't made publicly available the number of Kindle devices it has sold since their launch in 2007. put this number at around 1.5 million, but still, the company must be feeling the competitors' pinch, as last month , now priced at $299.

Sony Adds Exmor Sensor, G Lens to New Cyber-shots

Sony is the latest big-name company to announce point-and-shoot cameras for the fall. Two new Cyber-shot models offer high-end features previously found only in the .

Sony Cyber-shot digital cameras

In particular, both the Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 and the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 include the Exmor R CMOS sensor, which the company says produces excellent low-light shots at high ISO settings due to a revamped design. Sony says the Exmor R sensor captures more light in dark environments, due to the fact that light-blocking circuitry has moved to the bottom of the sensor.

The Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 also features a "premium" Sony G Lens; previously, until the debut of the bulky DSC-HX1 earlier in 2009, the G Lens was available only in the company's digital SLR cameras and high-end camcorders. Now, the DSC-WX1 offers the same optics in a pocketable frame.

In addition to the company's unique (also in the DSC-HX1), both upcoming Sony models feature a couple of new in-camera tricks. The DSC-TX1 and the DSC-WX1 each have a "Handheld Twilight" feature that takes six pictures in rapid succession at different exposure settings and then combines the images to create low-light shots with increased dynamic range.

Both cameras have ISO levels ranging from 80 to 3200. Although many point-and-shoot cameras generate a noticeable amount of noise at ISO settings of 800 and above, I took a few quick test shots during some brief hands-on time with the cameras, and the "Handheld Twilight" mode produced surprisingly sharp images at high ISO levels.

Aside from the shared features, the new Cyber-shots are very different animals. The 10-megapixel Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 is a fashionable, ultraslim (0.66 inches thick) camera with a 3-inch-diagonal touchscreen LCD, a 4X optical zoom (35mm to 140mm) bolstered by optical image stabilization, and 720p HD video recording (MPEG-4 files at 30 fps). Other than the shutter button, zoom, and playback buttons, controls for all camera operations are on the touchscreen. A stylus is included with the camera; but during my hands-on time, I found the screen responsive to finger gestures.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 digital camera

The DSC-TX1 will be available in gray, blue, pink, and silver for $380 starting in September.

Despite carrying a lower price, the Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 is a higher-end compact Cyber-shot, geared toward performance-minded buyers.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 digital camera

It offers a wide-angle, optically stabilized Sony G Lens with a 5X optical zoom (24mm to 120mm), 720p HD video recording (MPEG-4 files at 30 fps), and a 2.7-inch LCD screen. The DSC-WX1 will be available in black starting in October for $350.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Google Lets Military Move to the Front of the Line for Google Voice

google voiceGetting access to requires patience and luck, but not for members of the U.S. Military.

Service men and women with valid ".mil" e-mail addresses can sign up for the free call and voicemail management tool right now. All they need is a local number and someone in the United States to set it up. The rest of us have to .

U.S. Army SGT Dale Sweetnam, who is working with Google's communications team as part of an Army fellowship, wrote on that the service can be used for "a care package in audio form." Family members can call the trooper's Google Voice number and leave voice mails, which can be checked later from a computer on the Internet.

That seems to be the biggest benefit to service members stationed in, say, Iraq or Afghanistan. A press release from Google also notes that Google Voice allows a trooper to have one number even when he or she switches bases.

Google is not stressing the ability to make cheap international calls. It's probably not feasible in areas where service to the Internet is spotty, and for Google it's definitely not worth pointing out a potential revenue source from this act of good will.

So what's in it for Google? It's all about the PR, but not just in the "we love our the troops" sense. By handing out a story that the media will lap up -- not only techies, but the mainstream press, I imagine -- Google gets free advertising for a couple of Google Voice features. Leave voice mails for loved ones in different time zones! Have one number no matter where you move! It's brilliant, and maybe even takes a subtle jab at Apple for from the iPhone.

It also suggests that Google Voice is . I got an invite in mid-July, less than a month after requesting it, and I can see this wait time steadily dwindling down until the service either opens to everyone or starts allowing peer invites, as Gmail did in its early days.

For now, our troops should enjoy being at the front of the line.

About That PlayStation 3 Price Cut in Two Weeks

Predicting PlayStation 3 price drops is at this point a bit like buying up every lottery ticket in the universe before playing. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. The chances that Sony won't eventually whack a chunk of change off its price tag are of course scientifically zero, so it's all down to guessing, guessing again, then guessing again until you've got it right. Right?

Right, except for the part where you annoy the public to the point they understandably bite the hand off and feed it back to you. No one likes to be jerked around. Stand up. Sit down. Stand up. Sit down. You know the procedure. It's not exactly like the , but there are trace similarities.

Thus: If about a slimmed up PS3 and corresponding price cut to be announced at the are accurate, it won't be a coup so much as inevitably accurate prognostication.

As critical as we in the press have been about Sony's redoubtable refusal to budge so much as a penny, point, set, and match to Sony for hewing to its financial principles and not so much outfoxing as outlasting its harshest critics and doomsayers. Many predicted the PS3 would be impacted deleteriously by towing the "boutique pricing" line. At launch, "I think Sony shot themselves in the foot…there is a high probability [they] will fail…the price point is probably unsustainable."

The truth is that Sony's done reasonably well despite those intuitively unfavorable price-point odds, selling some 24 million units worldwide since November 2006. Stack that against the Xbox 360, sitting at around 31 million worldwide since November 2005.

It's important when you're matching numbers--for those that care probably more than they should about this stuff--to remember that Microsoft had a full year lead. It's easy to forget that, 3-4 years along. Depending on your vantage, Sony's PS3 has actually sold more units in an aggregate period-to-period (32 vs. 44 months) comparison. However you draw up the math, the company is holding third place with grace, behind their primary competitor in worldwide unit sales by a notable span, but certainly not an unreasonable one.

for alerting me to the fact that Amazon US just dropped the price of from $500 to $450, and reminding us that (basically Europe's E3) is just a few weeks away. I don't know who "several sections of the industry" preceding the statement "believe an official price drop for the console will be announced by Sony" refers to, but is that Sony's up to "something" (isn't that just brilliant?). Mind you, said blogs are wrong a lot of the time (or at best "right" in the sense that in throwing a thousand darts--and blog posts--at a dartboard, eventually one will glancingly hit).

All of this latest round of speculating comes on the heels of Sony's late July announcement that it's lopped off PS3 manufacturing costs since launch. Factor in a report last week ("Sony PS3 components demand growing significantly") that Sony's ordered up enough parts to make one million consoles in the third quarter of this year, i.e. twice as many as the same period last year. The implications are, well, what the implications are: Sony's either planning to sell a whole lot of price-unchanged PS3's this holiday, or use a price drop to fuel a sales boom.

Since we're about as good in the press as meteorologists at predicting the weather, might as well have some fun with it. Based on the above and/or any additional evidence you care to consider, what do you think?

Windows 7: Four Reasons to Upgrade, Four Reasons to Stay Away

The begins a tale of two operating systems: the one you want and the one you don't. It is packed with improvements and cool stuff, but it still carries a whiff of Vista that may put XP diehards off. That said, people who have gotten used to Vista will enjoy the fact that Windows 7 looks the same but acts a whole lot better.

Like many people who compute both at home and at work, I use XP and Vista as well as Mac OS X Leopard, and I like elements of all three. So I've been watching the beta and RC versions of Windows 7 very closely. Does the final "release to manufacturing" (RTM) code -- the same code that will ship with new PCs and retail versions of Windows 7 in October -- merit a jump from any of my current platforms?

Well, yes and no.

Little features like the ability to burn CDs from single ISO image files are great -- I don't need to install third-party tools to create CD-Rs anymore. And Windows 7 definitely boots up faster than XP or Vista on identically configured machines. You can't knock the advantage of 60 seconds less boot time.

But grrr! Just when things were going well, I tried to do a little light video editing, only to discover that Windows Movie Maker isn't included with Windows 7. It's now part of Microsoft Live, and it's still in beta. In its present form, it's much less capable than the app that ships with XP. So after ten minutes with Windows 7, I found myself booting up an old XP machine for an everyday task.

(I later discovered that there is a that works with Windows 7, although Microsoft's doesn't list Windows 7 among the supported OSes. Nevertheless, it's not nearly as elegant as having it included with the OS.)

What other joys and disappointments does the new Windows bring?

Finding stuff is easier...

Keeping track of your work is always going to be a chore. Fortunately, Windows 7 concentrates much of its efforts on making files accessible. Windows 7 clusters different file types into shortcuts called Libraries -- they look like Vista's Documents, Pictures and Videos folders, but they lead to files of the pertinent type whatever folder they are actually located in. You can add your own folders to Libraries at will to keep your project files accessible.

Then there are Jump Lists, a zippier way of previewing your open applications and folders. Moving a mouse over the taskbar pops up easy-to-scan lists of open windows, and right-clicking on them shows not only what's running, but a brief history of what you've done with those programs -- files opened, sites visited, and other handy pointers. That feature alone has the makings of a much more efficient workday.

And Windows 7's Search is streets ahead of earlier iterations: Like Mac OS X's Spotlight, it begins delivering results as you type -- before you've even finished a word -- and narrows the list as you enter more characters. You can also preview the contents of search results before deciding to open them.

Chalk up several productivity pluses for Windows 7.

...but it's just as tough to find the right version of the OS

When Windows Vista was released, one of the loudest complaints was about the overwhelming array of versions it came in. And while XP didn't initially ship with quite as many flavors, later additions such as the Media Center, Tablet PC and Professional x64 editions upped its version count as well. Despite pleas from pundits to available for Windows 7, however, things haven't gotten any simpler.

There's a Starter Edition for netbooks, two Home versions (Home Basic and Home Premium), plus a Professional, an Enterprise and an Ultimate edition. (There has been some confusion about whether there will be different versions for the European Union to comply with EU regulations; the latest from Microsoft appears to be that as elsewhere.) And, of course, most of these are available in both full versions and lower-priced upgrade versions for people with licensed retail copies of Windows 2000, XP or Vista.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Google aims at commuters with Google Apps ads

Some commuters will see billboards such as these touting Google Apps for a solid month.

(Credit: Google)

Google is taking its marketing strategy for Google Apps to the next level by renting prominent billboards in major U.S. cities.

Commuters in New York, Boston, Chicago, and San Francisco will be greeted by a progressive series of ads for starting Monday and running for a month. The idea is to catch IT managers stuck in horrific traffic spots like New York's West Side Highway or San Francisco's U.S. 101 and press them on the with a different ad for each day of the week.

Google has steadily increased the drumbeat behind Google Apps over the past several months, openly touting it with customer testimonials and . The company said 1.75 million organizations are now using Google's online services for word processing and e-mail, which is still a drop in the overall bucket but growing.

Traditionally Google hasn't been big on ads, but it and posted on Silicon Valley billboards years ago.

New hint of gallery for Chrome themes emerges



It looks like Google is nearing release for a gallery showcasing themes to customize Chrome's appearance, judging by one reader's experience.

When a person opens a , the browser shows an array of thumbnails of previously visited sites. One of those sites, the reader said, was labeled "Google Chrome Themes Gallery." The screenshot shows a multicolored array of themes for the browser.

It's a good thing Google apparently is working on the Web site, because already Chrome is ready to be directly connected to it.

The more easily for those who want to re-skin the browser. Most notably, there's a "Get themes" button in the Options dialog box that links to what at present is an .

Microsoft apps--only suckers pay retail

Windows

Has Microsoft got a deal for you...

(Credit: Microsoft)

Windows 7 Home Premium, the full retail version, lists for $199.99. Unless you are building a computer yourself, from scratch, you don't need it. Windows comes on computers, and if you buy a machine today with Vista, you get a free license to upgrade to Windows 7.

For computers you already own, you can get an upgrade edition for $119.99, which, if you have an existing Windows machine, is functionally the same (it does a clean install); it only needs to verify that you already have XP or Vista before doing its thing.

But don't get it. Because you can get three upgrade licenses all together for just $149 in the upgrade. You think Microsoft is going to check to see if everyone using the license is related to you?

Prices for Windows 7 Pro are higher, but the pricing programs are the same. For the full "Ultimate" version of Windows 7 (which seems to be a pointless product for 99.9 percent of consumers), prices are even higher, and there are fewer discount programs.

Office

For , the prices and packages have not been set yet, but we can assume they will be close to Office 2007, which retails for $299.99, or $182.49 for the upgrade version (on Amazon). You can do better.

You probably know that you can get the for a lot less (Office 2007 Home and Student is $81.99 on Amazon). This version omits Outlook from Office; the e-mail and calendar app is $79.99 by itself. Better yet is the three-user family pack for Office 2007 Home and Student. It's about the same price as the single-user version, $79.99 on Newegg.

If you can convince Microsoft that you're a college-level student--if you have a .edu e-mail from an accredited institution--you can get the version of Office, with Outlook, for just $59.95.

I assume the programs for the next version of Office will be similar, or perhaps slightly less expensive. So I project that a three-computer household will be able to upgrade its computers to Windows 7 and the latest version of Office (without Outlook) for about $76 per machine, or roughly twice that with Outlook (assuming family packs of Windows, a Home and Student edition of Office 2010 that's priced similarly to the current version, and the same a la cart deal for Outlook). That's more than Apple charges for upgrades, but it's not a wholly terrible expense.

Special subscriptions

So far I've covered the consumer versions of Windows and Office. If you're in business or if you manage more than a few computers for a large family, there are other programs you should also know about. Microsoft will put versions of Windows, Office, and other apps in your hands for a lot less than the retail prices, if you qualify for them. Or pretend to.

For example, there's the , a $299 yearly subscription that gives you 10 functional licenses to every business app Microsoft makes, including Windows, Office (the full enterprise edition), other apps, and even server programs like Exchange. There are restrictions, of course: It's only for --companies that re-sell Microsoft products one way or the other. You have to complete an online certification course, which may include simply passing an online quiz based on a Microsoft marketing presentation. Also, you're prohibited from using the software in a production environment; it's for training and demo purposes only. I can't recommend that anyone break a license agreement, but Microsoft has so many resellers I seriously doubt enforcement for the Partner program is rigorous.

If you work at a software start-up, you can subscribe to the program for up to three years at a cost of only $100 when you leave the program. This gets you access to Windows, Office, Visual Studio, Microsoft's hosted apps, and even hosting of your own apps on Azure, when it's available. Eligibility: your business must be less than three years old, in the software business, and make less than $1 million a year in revenue. But the licenses are for production software, so it's a great deal.

There are two other main programs that get you a steady stream of Microsoft software, but they're not as attractive to the general user or business as the previous programs:

IT pros can sign up for a subscription, which provides unrestricted evaluation versions (in other words, not licensed for production applications) of commercial products like Windows, Office, and several other apps. The download-only version of TechNet is $349 per user for the first year, $249 a year thereafter. You pay more if you want DVDs shipped to you. TechNet gives IT people and system admins access to anything, for the purposes of supporting other users.

TechNet subscribers also get pre-release code of some products (like Windows) so they can work with them before they have to start supporting the products on client computers.

Microsoft's most expensive subscription service for companies in the computer business is MSDN, but it's also the program that will get you access to pretty much every bit of code in the Microsoft arsenal, current and previous versions included. MSDN also gives subscribers access to Microsoft's developer tools and resources. Subscription prices range from $999 to $10,939 per user for the first year (renewal years are less) depending on what you get and the level of support offered. Like TechNet and Action Pack, MSDN code is not licensed for use in the real world--only for development.

By the book

Want to play it straight and buy multiple fully licensed production versions of Microsoft products? You'll pay. I asked the Web page to give me a quote on 10 licenses of Standard, and it quoted me $588 per user. I got the same price for 100 licenses. If you ever wondered why Microsoft is such a rich company, this explains it. So the smaller company might want to skip the official business versions of the apps and go with standard retail products. There is also, obviously, a big temptation for very small companies to push things a bit and try to qualify for Microsoft's special or home programs that yield huge discounts on the company's software.

Facebook app lets Intel PCs donate processor power

Can't donate your personal time to a good cause? Intel is providing what may be the next best option.

Intel teamed up with on Monday to launch a Facebook application that allows the spare processing power in a PC to be used to fight diseases and study climate change.

The massive amount of data crunching necessary for high level research is often extremely expensive or not readily available--or both. Intel's solution is Progress Thru Processors, a computing application built on the Facebook platform that allows people to donate their PC's available data processing capacity to research projects such as , which uses computers to determine the 3-dimensional shapes of proteins that may ultimately lead to finding cures for some major human diseases.

GridRepublic application allows computers to work on public-interest research projects when the machines are not otherwise in use.

GridRepublic application allows computers to work on public-interest research projects when the machines are not otherwise in use.

(Credit: Intel)

In addition to Rosetta@home, Progress Thru Processors participants can choose to contribute processor power to the research efforts of Climateprediction.net and Africa@home. is dedicated to increased understanding of global climate change by predicting the Earth's climate and testing the accuracy of climate models. is currently focused on finding optimal strategies to combat malaria by studying simulation models of disease transmission and the potential impact of new anti-malarial drugs and vaccines.

"By simply running an application on your computer, which uses very little incremental resources, you can expand computing resources to researchers," Deborah Conrad, Intel vice president and general manager of corporate marketing, said in a statement.

The application was launched Monday as a public beta and available to all Facebook users and is available for download .

The application will activate only when a PC's performance is not being fully utilized. When the participant's computer usage demands more processor performance, the application defers and sits idle until spare processing capabilities become available again, Intel said. The application runs automatically as a background process on a PC and will not affect performance or any other tasks, according to Intel.

Progress Thru Processors does not require participants to leave their computers powered up unnecessarily. By keeping their PCs on only as they normally would, participants will still be contributing, Intel said.

Monday, August 3, 2009

Web Surfers Forced to Choose Security or Anonymity

A Google service that helps also gathers data about browsing activities that users are trying to keep secret, a researcher told attendees at the Black Hat security conference last week in Las Vegas.


Google Safe, a database service that warns Internet users when they are about to enter infected pages, marks browsers so the users can be identified even if they proxy all their traffic through another IP address, says Robert Hansen, CEO of Internet security firm SecTheory. "It's a privacy-security tradeoff," Hansen says.

and browsers are both susceptible to the problem, he says. Others may be as well, but Hansen hasn't tested them. (See "")

Browsers routinely connect to Google Safe as often as 30 times per hour to download updated lists of sites Google has found to be . When users attempt to connect to these sites, the browsers display a warning that they are potentially unsafe so users can avoid them.

These same users might also want to mask their Internet activity by directing their traffic through proxy sites, but Google gathers data that reveals the actual machine, Hansen says.

When browsers connect to Google Safe, the service leaves a cookie in the browser. If a user subsequently turns on an anonymizing proxy, Google will have a record of that cookie resolving to two different IP addresses – its actual address and the proxy address, Hansen says.

So the user will expect to thwart anyone trying to find out where their traffic comes from, but Google's logs would associate the proxy address with the user, he says. "Google knows you have two IP addresses associated with that cookie," he says. "They can correlate it, but the question is, are they doing it?"

To remain anonymous, users can turn off the auto-update feature in their browser that gathers fresh unsafe URLs from Google Safe, but that is a bad idea, too. "It protects you from malware and phishing sites. It's really important to the public. That's why it exists in the first place," Hansen says.'

The Chrome browser gathers more identifying information – a hash of the machine ID and of the user ID, he says. That means proxied traffic can be traced to not only a particular IP address but also an individual machine at that address. Investigators would have to enter the machine ID and user ID into the browser, have the browser hash it, and match the results with the hashes logged with Google Safe to identify a suspect machine, he says.

How far back an individual's Internet activity could be tracked depends on how long Google Safe maintains its logs, he says.

Windows 7 Prices: Scrutinize for Real Deals

Microsoft has confirmed pricing of a multi-license "family pack" for Windows 7, as well as the prices for the in-place Anytime Upgrades users can buy to bump up to the next level of the operating system.

As when , the upcoming Windows 7 Family Pack will be priced at $149.99. The pack lets buyers upgrade as many as three PCs from Windows XP or Vista to Windows 7 Home Premium. Microsoft will start selling the pack October 22, the same day as in the U.S., Canada and what Microsoft calls "select markets."

windows 7 A spokeswoman said retailers will be able to take pre-orders for the pack starting Oct. 18, but added that she had no idea whether those pre-orders would be offered at a discount, as were pre-orders for Windows 7 this month.

Priced at $149.99, the Family Pack would save the buyer $210 over three separate Home Premium Upgrades. The $50 per license price tag for Windows 7 is a 38% savings compared to the $80 per license that Microsoft charged for a two-license family pack for Vista back in 2007.

Microsoft also revealed the pricing of its Anytime Upgrade scheme, which lets users move up the Windows 7 edition stack by buying, say, an upgrade from Starter, the version slated for the very cheapest netbooks, to Home Premium.

In that scenario, an AnyTime Upgrade costs $79.99, slightly less than the average price as by four online resellers, who had it listed from $80.99 to $89.98.

Upgrades from Windows 7 Home Premium to Professional or Ultimate will cost $89.99 and $139.99, respectively.

At least one analyst has said those prices are too high to tempt users, particularly those who have bought inexpensive netbooks running Windows 7 Starter. "Microsoft needs to be more aggressive," Stephen Baker, an analyst with the NPD Group, said two weeks ago. "At those prices, there won't be many opportunities to [convince users to] trade up. If people are buying cheap [PCs] they're buying cheap for a reason."

Microsoft's not giving customers much, if any, discount once they have Windows 7. At suggested list prices, there's only an $80 difference between Home Premium Upgrade and Professional Upgrade, and $100 between the two "Full" editions. The Anytime Upgrade from Home Premium to Professional, meanwhile, costs $90.

It's even less enticing to take the Home Premium-to-Ultimate path using Anytime Upgrade. Microsoft's priced that at $140, higher than both the $100 difference between the retail Home Premium Upgrade and Ultimate Upgrade, and the $120 difference between the "Full" editions of those versions.

Even so, Microsoft worked to pitch the Starter-Home Premium route. In a post to the Windows Team blog, spokesman Brandon LeBlanc cited that scenario as one where Anytime Upgrade will be useful. "A customer may purchase a netbook thinking they would primarily use it for e-mail," he said. "Over time, they find they are using that netbook as their primary every-day PC. That person then decides they want their netbook to do more."

Baker countered, saying that Microsoft's May move with Starter -- it that would have blocked users from running more than three applications at a time -- kills most users' motivation for upgrading to Home Premium. "Microsoft has said that Windows 7 runs pretty well on netbooks," Baker said, and if users take the company at its word, they won't feel the need to upgrade from Starter.

Windows Anytime Upgrades will be available Oct. 22, both as an electronic download or as a retail purchase; both will provide an upgrade product key, but no media.

metatag data

Apple Fans Uneasy Over App Store Rule on Google Voice

Apple's pretty used to doing things its way. It guards access to its , controlling access to its inviting virtual shelves by a mysterious set of .

google voice apple app storeAlthough Apple has reversed course on and , and , the company pretty much keeps its own counsel on such matters. And it's clear Apple

So it was a new experience for Apple when, on Friday, the FCC to Apple, Google, and AT&T asking why was from the App Store.

google voice apple app storeAlthough the logical thought would be that AT&T coerced Apple into making the decision in the carrier's interest, that AT&T denies any involvement in decisions about the App Store.

(We know of at least one exception to the claim of hands-off decision-making; the works only in the phone's Wi-Fi mode, and not over AT&T's 3G connection. AT&T says its terms of service prohibit apps that redirect a TV signal to mobile units, claiming it's a drain on the network.)

Then again, BlackBerry phones on the AT&T network .

Lee Lloyd wrote in a comment on TechCrunch, "Has there been any evidence of AT&T objecting to users installing [Google Voice] on their BlackBerry thus far? If not, I would say it is pretty safe to assume that it is Apple who has a problem with the app, not AT&T."

As with anything Apple, this news is generating a lot of dialogue on social media, forums, story comments, and blogs.

DUSTmurph wrote on forums, "Apple's guidelines for allowing Apps into the App Store is way too strict."

Many posts are critical of Apple's unclear and dictator-like rule over the Apps Store.

Madwh commented on , "I can't wait for the day the iPhone will be treated like a computer. How would you feel if Microsoft would first have to approve all programs on Windows?"

google voice apple app storeApple would be wise to investigate what is being said about it. Although the company typically has a large fan base that is quick to come to its defense, most people are taking a critical stance on Apple's management of the App Store.

All that being said, it is funny to note the FCC's sudden interest. It isn't as if the Apple's approval process has been under scrutiny for several months now.

As Digitalgravity noted in a response to the , "... ‘Someone at the FCC really wanted Google Voice on their iPhone!'"

What do you think of this case and/or Apple's App Store?

Apple vs. Microsoft: Rival Strategies, Rival Results

It's been a rough year for everyone, even multi-billion-dollar companies that make computers. Well, maybe which seems to be doing okay, based on .

apple microsoft windowsBy contrast, Microsoft in July. In fact, its poor showing for the third fiscal quarter -- revenue down 6% year-over-year and lower than expectations, earnings per share a jolting 30% off over the same period -- was notable enough that it made the news at the top of the hour on NPR, which isn't usually seen as a capitalist media tool.

Of course, one of the reasons Microsoft cited was, "Well, the economy sucks all over." True enough, and part of was due to lousy sales of new PCs to businesses, which ate away at Microsoft's money stream of OEM Windows license fees. (I could mention the poor reception for Vista, but at this point, that's last year's news.)

There was a slight rise in sales of netbooks, for which Windows licenses cost less -- more on this later. But there were losses generally across the board, from Microsoft's search ("Let's kill Google!") to the division that runs Windows Mobile ("Let's kill Nokia!") and the Xbox ("Let's kill Sony and Nintendo!").

Over the same period, Apple had its . The company saw a rise in all stats year over year, from revenue to earnings-per-share to gross margins. Sales of Macs remained steady, inching up 4%. iPod sales dropped a slight 7% (I know the iPhone has replaced my iPod needs). iPhones, well -- up 626%.

That is not a typo. Nor is the number -- cited by research firm NPD -- for Apple's share of the market for PCs costing more than $1,000: 91%. That number should be taken with a number of caveats: NPD could only look at physical stores and not virtual ones such as Dell's; the average selling price for a Windows-based desktop was under $500; Apple's overall PC market share remains less than 10%; Apple simply doesn't make much that sells for under $999, other than the Mac mini. Still, you have to remember that the pro-level computing marketplace is a thriving one with high margins, giving Apple a healthy base for its primary revenue source: hardware.

Sunday, August 2, 2009

How Printers Can Rob You Blind

Is your printer stealing from you? Yes--if it's making you replace ink or toner constantly, or if you need to buy pricey special paper to get the best output. Maybe it's stealing your time or sanity by being a lot slower than it said it'd be, or having cheapo components that break or are just plain hard to use. PC World reveals some sinners-and saints-based on our recent .

Our Top 10 charts keep tabs on this and more. We test speed and print quality; we try all the features; and we price ink and toner to see if you're going to get reamed. For instance, while you'd think any would be cheap, think again: Some models have surprisingly pricey toner, like the chart.

Multifunction printers (MFPs) are especially popular in small offices that need to do more in less space. The is a standout for being good at everything and offering cheap inks. Wish we could say the same for the , whose ink costs are ridiculous even for its high-yield cartridges. One of the most balanced among color-laser MFPs is the . And then there's the , whose toner is some of the most expensive we've ever priced.

The cost of a printer goes far beyond its purchase price. Make sure it's not stealing from you by checking ink or toner costs before you buy; and check PC World's reviews for other hidden costs or gotchas.

FCC Questions Apple Over Google Voice

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission has written to Apple, AT&T and Google questioning the and related applications from the iPhone App Store.

google voice apple app storeIn a letter sent Friday to Apple, the agency asked the company which related applications have been rejected along with it, and what role AT&T may have played in the decision. It also asked what the difference is between Google Voice and other VoIP (voice over Internet Protocol) software that has been approved for the iPhone.

More broadly the agency asked Apple what other for the phone and why.

Apple's for the iPhone has drawn wide criticism for being murky and unpredictable. Google Voice is a VoIP service that lets users set up one phone number and have it ring on all of their phones at once, and control which phones ring at which times of the day or week, among other things.

The rejection of Google Voice, and the removal from the App Store of third-party applications that use it, led some observers to suspect AT&T squelched the software because it feared competition for its own voice services. In its letter, the FCC cited .

Agency Wants Answers

apple appstoreThe agency requested answers from all three companies by the close of business on Aug. 21.

to declare that carriers can't stop consumers from using its peer-to-peer VoIP service over their mobile networks. Just last month, the agency said it would investigate exclusivity deals between handset makers and carriers to determine whether they hurt consumer choice and innovation.

In a letter addressed to Catherine Novelli, Apple's vice president of worldwide government affairs, the FCC asked in evaluating applications for the iPhone, including contractual provisions and "non-contractual understandings" between the companies.

It also asked Apple to , give the major reasons for rejecting applications, and say what percentage are turned down.

This information, if made public, would provide clarity that many developers and consumers have been clamoring for since the last year. The FCC wrote that if Apple wants to keep any of its answers confidential, it has to submit a statement giving specific reasons why. "Accordingly, 'blanket' requests for confidentiality of a large set of documents are unacceptable," the letter said. All three letters were signed by James Schlichting, acting chief of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.

Also Questioned: AT&T, Google

The FCC's questions for AT&T cover much the same ground, but it also asks whether any devices on AT&T's network allow use of Google Voice or other applications that have been rejected for the iPhone.

In its letter to Google, the agency asks about any communications with Apple about Google Voice. It also asks whether there are any other Google applications pending with Apple and what services they provide. The FCC also asks about for its own Android mobile platform.

Windows 7 Ultimate RTM Cracked, Fully Validated (Already?)

That didn't take long. It has only been a week since by Microsoft, but crackers have already managed to activate and validate the tricked-out Ultimate version of the OS. The hack is nothing new, as it borrows the same techniques used to bypass activation and verification of previous Vista editions.

, crackers somehow obtained a copy of an OEM Windows 7 Ultimate disc from Lenovo. From there, they were able to extract two critical bits of information: Windows 7's OEM-SLP (system-locked pre-installation) product key and the OEM certificate for Windows 7 Ultimate.

But before these can be of any value, one first has to modify a system's BIOS to fool the operating system into believing that the PC is an authentic OEM machine. This is done by tweaking the values found in the Software Licensing Description Table (SLIC) that is stored in the system's memory during boot-up.

Once a person has disguised a system as a legitimate OEM machine, the OEM-SLP and OEM certificate allow for permanent, validated activation of the operating system. To Microsoft, the PC is no different from a functional OEM machine--and the "OEM machine," in turn, has no need to call back to Microsoft's activation servers for any kind of additional verification. That would defeat the convenient basis behind the creation of SLIC-based OEM activations in the first place.

Just because the OEM disc and keys came from Lenovo doesn't mean that the crack is exclusive to that brand. According to Softpedia, the crack has proven successful on Dell, HP, and MSI machines as well.

Facebook Etiquette: 10 Rules for Better Socializing

What's okay on Facebook? On sites like MySpace, anything goes (or seems to), but the on Facebook seem to be a little more refined--not a lot, mind you, but a little. Keep these tips in mind, whether you're making your first friend or your 1000th.

Who should you friend? Some people adopt an everyone-welcome policy on Facebook and accept all friend requests; some only want real-world contacts in their friends list. In deciding on the right approach for you, bear in mind that the bigger your friend network is, the more application, event, chat session, and cause invitations you'll receive--and that can lead to some and the occasional friend purge.

Easy on the updates. As on Twitter, oversharing on Facebook can be a problem. Every meal eaten, every TV show experienced, and every weather condition observed need not be the subject of a status update. Ask yourself whether anyone is likely to care about your comment before you start typing.

"Now, choose 12 friends..." It's fine if you want to take a "Which serial killer are you?" quiz. , however, you'll almost certainly be asked to invite a dozen or so people to take the quiz, too; there's no need for this unless you think they'll really enjoy it. Look for a 'Skip this step' or 'Continue to result' button (in tiny type) somewhere on the page, click it, and you won't have to send invitations to anyone as a precondition to getting your quiz results. Clicking the 'Skip' button on the following screen will prevent the quiz from showing up on your wall or being shared on your friends' walls.

Limit Facebook chat. Just because someone has a Facebook window open doesn't mean they're automatically available for a chat session. Facebook Chat is like any other instant messaging platform--use it appropriately, and recognize that your friends may be too busy to respond immediately, especially during business hours.

No pokes. If you are over the age of 16, don't "poke" people--seriously.

Avoid "Group think.” One among many Facebook users involves creating a Group for a business concern, and then inviting everyone under the sun to join the group. This is a misuse of the feature--and bad manners--since Groups are designed to serve as gathering places to discuss genuine leisure, cultural, social, or other common interests, not as ad hoc copy shops. Common courtesy should impel you not to create a Group for your business--but if you insist on doing so anyway, please invite only employees to join the Group. If your business needs a Facebook presence, create an official Page for it; then, if you must, invite friends to becomes fans of that Page.

Beware of embarrassing photos. Resist the temptation to post every last photo from your birthday party on Facebook, particularly images that may cast your guests in an unflattering light. If you have any doubt, ask the subjects of any iffy pics in advance whether they'd mind your posting the shots; then abide by their wishes.

Tag lightly. The same thing goes for tagging: The people in a picture might not object to its being online as long as their names are not associated with it.

Untag at will; click for full-size image. Or... untag thyself. It is no breach of etiquette to untag yourself from any photograph. Remember, though, that untagging is permanent: You can't be retagged to a photo once the tag is removed.

Ignore away. You are under no obligation to acknowledge a Facebook friend request, whether it comes from a stranger or from someone you know but don't want as part of your digital life. After all, you wouldn't be obliged to seat visitors at your dinner table if they showed up without warning at your house at 7 o'clock. (One alternative way of dealing with this situation is to add iffy contacts to a severely restricted limited profile list.) On the flipside, if you want to friend a stranger (for whatever reason), add a note of explanation to your friend request, explaining who you are and the reason for your request.